A recent BC Supreme Court decision has clarified the parties that must be named in an action to enforce a builders lien involving common property.… Continue Reading
This article provides a consolidated overview of recent developments in the six judicial review proceedings challenging the governmental approvals of Site C. Please check our blog for future updates on key developments in the proceedings.… Continue Reading
Those who claim a builders lien must comply strictly with the requirements of the Builders Lien Act, and owners (or at least their counsel) are frequently on the lookout for liens that can be extinguished for a failure to satisfy such requirements. The recent BC Supreme Court decision in Stanley Paulus Architect Inc. v. Windmill Holdings Ltd., 2014 BCSC 1816 serves as a reminder of one fundamental requirement: in order to claim a lien there must be an “improvement” within the meaning of the Act. More particularly, there is no “improvement” where construction has not yet commenced … Continue Reading
Earlier this year, we discussed the decision of the BC Supreme Court in Pan Canadian Mortgage Group v. 679972 B.C. Ltd. in our publication Real Estate MATTERS. That decision was significant because it was a rare instance in which a BC court declared that a purchaser’s lien had been established, thereby effectively turning the relevant purchasers into secured creditors. A purchaser’s lien is an equitable remedy that may arise when a purchaser makes a payment (such as a deposit) toward the purchase price under a contract of purchase and sale. If the purchase and sale of the property fails … Continue Reading
On March 4, 2014, the B.C. Court of Appeal released its judgment in Woo v. Onni 2014 BCCA 76, reversing the decision of the court below which was the first to allow purchasers to rescind their contracts under the Real Estate Development Marketing Act (“REDMA”) post–closing.
The case involved 10 purchasers in a residential condominium project who had entered into contracts on a pre-sale basis. The contracts were completed and the purchasers took possession of their units but, 16 months later, after discovering that the developer had failed to deliver to them the amendment to the … Continue Reading
On December 12, 2013, amendments to section 173 of B.C.’s Strata Property Act, SBC 1998, c 43, came into force that allow strata corporations with majority support to apply to the BC Supreme Court to require strata owners to pay for certain repairs.
Prior to the amendment, strata corporations required a ¾ vote in favour to impose a special levy to raise money for needed repairs to common property. This could result in deadlock and delay when owner opinion was divided, exacerbating damage and unsafe conditions.
On application by a strata corporation within 90 days of it receiving at least … Continue Reading